|
Most residents of the Pacific Northwest believe that there should be a balance between the use and protection of our natural resources. Natural resources can be defined as soil, water, air, minerals, and biological organisms (trees, fish, etc.).
In a 2002 survey, residents were asked how they viewed the use and protection of natural resources compared to the average American adult. They were asked to rate use/protection of natural resources on a scale from 1 to 9. A value of 1 indicates that all natural resources should be freely used by humans, while a value of 10 indicates that all natural resources should be protected and not used by humans. A value of 5 indicates an equal balance between resource use and resource protection. The average ranking of the 940 residents of Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington who completed this survey was 5.6 (Figure 1). This value, although leaning toward the environmental protection side, indicates that residents want to see a balance between natural resource use and protection. The demographic factors of state of residence, age, education , length of residency in the region, and community size also impacted the response to this question.
Residents of Washington (5.8) and Oregon (5.6) tended to rate environmental protection higher than residents of Alaska (5.4) and Idaho (5.1) (Figure 2). This would be expected because a larger percentage of jobs in Idaho and Alaska are dependent on the use of natural resources (forestry, agriculture, mining, fishing, etc.). Conversely, the scores are higher in Oregon and Washington which have larger urban populations where jobs are not as dependent on the exploitation of natural resources.
Younger residents are more likely to lean toward protection/preservation of natural resources than senior citizens (Figure 3). This may be explained by the emphasis placed on environmental education in schools over the last 25 years.
The PNW Water Survey
A 50-question survey was developed by the Pacific Northwest
water quality team to document public awareness, aptitudes,
attitudes and actions toward water quality in Alaska, Idaho,
Oregon and Washington. Demographic data about the survey respondents
were also collected. This statistically designed survey was
completed by over 50 percent of the 1,800 residents who were
solicited for this study in 2002. Several questions in this
survey dealt with drinking water quality. The sampling error
of this survey question was +/- 3 percent. |
|
 |